Newly released court documents reveal that Prince Andrew forwarded confidential UK government trade reports to convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein in 2010, potentially violating his duty as a British trade envoy and raising serious questions about national security and elite accountability.
Story Snapshot
- Prince Andrew allegedly shared sensitive UK trade intelligence on Vietnam, Singapore, China, and Afghanistan with Jeffrey Epstein during his tenure as Special Representative for International Trade
- Emails show Andrew forwarded reports within minutes of receiving them, directly contradicting his claims that he had cut off contact with Epstein by 2010
- UK trade envoys are legally bound to maintain confidentiality on sensitive commercial and political information, making these revelations potentially criminal
- Police are now reviewing allegations against Andrew while similar accusations against Peter Mandelson face formal investigation for misconduct in public office
Confidential Reports Shared With Convicted Offender
Emails extracted from recently released U.S. court files show Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor forwarding UK government trade briefings to Jeffrey Epstein throughout 2010. The documents included sensitive details about British investment opportunities in Vietnam, Singapore, and China, as well as a Christmas Eve email discussing Afghanistan reconstruction projects in Helmand Province funded by UK taxpayers. These communications occurred while Andrew served as the UK’s Special Representative for International Trade and Investment, a position requiring strict adherence to confidentiality protocols regarding commercial and political intelligence.
Direct Contradiction to Previous Claims
The timing of these email exchanges directly undermines Andrew’s previous assertions about his relationship with Epstein. Andrew has repeatedly claimed he severed contact with the convicted sex offender before 2010, yet the newly surfaced correspondence shows active, ongoing communication during that exact period. The speed with which Andrew forwarded these reports—often within minutes of receiving them—suggests a pattern of deliberate information sharing rather than accidental disclosure. This behavior raises fundamental questions about Andrew’s judgment and his understanding of the confidentiality requirements attached to his official role.
Violation of Official Duty and Public Trust
UK trade envoys operate under explicit guidance prohibiting the sharing of sensitive commercial or political information obtained through their official capacity. Andrew’s actions appear to represent a clear breach of this duty, potentially exposing British economic interests and government strategy to a known criminal with extensive international connections. The documents included information about government-funded reconstruction efforts in active conflict zones, raising additional concerns about operational security. For Americans who understand the importance of protecting classified and sensitive information, this casual disregard for national security protocols from someone in a privileged position is deeply troubling.
Pattern of Elite Impunity Continues
Despite the mounting evidence, no formal investigation into Andrew’s trade report leaks has been announced, though Thames Valley Police are reviewing separate allegations against him. Meanwhile, Peter Mandelson faces active investigation for similar accusations of sharing files with Epstein during 2009-2010, creating an uncomfortable parallel. King Charles stripped Andrew of his prince title in October 2025, and he has been evicted from Royal Lodge, yet these administrative actions fall short of legal accountability. The failure to pursue criminal charges reinforces the perception that elites operate under different rules than ordinary citizens who would face immediate prosecution for comparable breaches.
The revelations compound Andrew’s already devastating fall from grace, which included settling a civil lawsuit with Virginia Giuffre for approximately £10-12 million, partially funded by the late Queen. The ongoing Epstein document releases continue to expose the depth of connections between powerful figures and the convicted trafficker, undermining public confidence in institutions that allowed these relationships to flourish unchecked. For conservatives who value the rule of law and equal justice, the apparent reluctance to hold Andrew fully accountable represents another example of a two-tiered justice system that protects the politically connected while ordinary Americans face harsh consequences for far lesser infractions.
Sources:
Ex-Prince Andrew appears to have shared UK trade files with Epstein – Daily Sabah
